Phase III

Women's & Reproductive Health

pain 62#27volume 422#53

Pain rank 27 of 76, volume rank 53 of 76 by industry trials. Trials here amend about 1.5x and fail enrollment about 1.0x the map median.

What this is worth

The amendment proxy, priced. Order of magnitude, anchor cited, assumptions on the table.

Per 100 industry trials in this cell, about 60 rewrite their eligibility criteria at least once. At the industry average of $450k direct cost per amendment, with the 6+ weeks of delay each not even counted, that is at least $27M at stake per 100 trials. Across the roughly 422 industry trials here, the floor is $113M.

If amendments fell by10%$11M30%$34M50%$56M

Assumes $450k direct cost per amendment (industry average; Phase II median runs lower, Phase III higher, and delay cost is excluded), applied to the proxy rate. The proxy counts only trials with at least one eligibility change, so this understates the true exposure. How this is derived.

The signals

Industry sponsors first, since that is the commercial buyer, each figure shown against the map median. All-sponsor figures follow. A trial counts as concluded once it has finished, whether completed, terminated or withdrawn.

Industry sponsors62pain index
Eligibility amendments
60%vs map 40%proxyn = 47sampled
Enrollment failure
14%vs map 13%n = 385concluded
Startup lag
43 dvs map 45.5 dn = 172with dates
Median duration
20.0 mon = 383completed
All sponsors62pain index
Eligibility amendments
41%proxyn = 88sampled
Enrollment failure
16%n = 978concluded
Startup lag
66 dn = 629with dates
Median duration
23.0 mon = 1,264completed
Why these trials stoppedsponsor decision leads

The most common category here is sponsor decision (13 of 53 stopped). A keyword pass runs first; free text it could not place was sorted once by a frozen AI classification into these same categories, auditable rather than a live model. "No enrollment recorded (inferred)" is not a stated reason: it is read from a zero enrollment count, meaning the trial never enrolled anyone. "Not reported" means the sponsor left the field blank, shown rather than hidden.

Sponsor decision13 (25%)
Low accrual12 (23%)
Safety or tolerability12 (23%)
No enrollment recorded (inferred)inferred6 (11%)
Not reported5 (9%)
Other stated reason2 (4%)
Technical or device issue2 (4%)
Business or funding1 (2%)
n = 53terminated or withdrawn
Evidence12 trials

A sample of terminated or withdrawn trials in this cell. Each links to its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

TrialSponsorStatusStated reason
NCT06904274BayerterminatedLow accrual
NCT05264506Organon and CoterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT04372121Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.terminatedLow accrual
NCT03986944Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.terminatedLow accrual
NCT03699176BayerwithdrawnLow accrual
NCT03559010HRA PharmaterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT03476928BayerterminatedSponsor decision
NCT03400956BayerterminatedSponsor decision
NCT03400943BayerterminatedSponsor decision
NCT03343067AbbVieterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT03240523BayerterminatedSponsor decision
NCT03202186BHR Pharma, LLCterminatedLow accrual

Women's & Reproductive Health at other phases