Phase IV

Endocrine & Metabolic

pain 44#45volume 646#38

Pain rank 45 of 76, volume rank 38 of 76 by industry trials. Trials here amend about 1.0x and fail enrollment about 0.8x the map median.

What this is worth

The amendment proxy, priced. Order of magnitude, anchor cited, assumptions on the table.

Per 100 industry trials in this cell, about 42 rewrite their eligibility criteria at least once. At the industry average of $450k direct cost per amendment, with the 6+ weeks of delay each not even counted, that is at least $19M at stake per 100 trials. Across the roughly 646 industry trials here, the floor is $123M.

If amendments fell by10%$12M30%$37M50%$61M

Assumes $450k direct cost per amendment (industry average; Phase II median runs lower, Phase III higher, and delay cost is excluded), applied to the proxy rate. The proxy counts only trials with at least one eligibility change, so this understates the true exposure. How this is derived.

The signals

Industry sponsors first, since that is the commercial buyer, each figure shown against the map median. All-sponsor figures follow. A trial counts as concluded once it has finished, whether completed, terminated or withdrawn.

Industry sponsors44pain index
Eligibility amendments
42%vs map 40%proxyn = 45sampled
Enrollment failure
11%vs map 13%n = 584concluded
Startup lag
44 dvs map 45.5 dn = 268with dates
Median duration
17.0 mon = 593completed
All sponsors37pain index
Eligibility amendments
30%proxyn = 90sampled
Enrollment failure
14%n = 1,964concluded
Startup lag
63 dn = 1,149with dates
Median duration
21.0 mon = 2,533completed
Why these trials stoppedlow accrual leads

The most common category here is low accrual (20 of 62 stopped). A keyword pass runs first; free text it could not place was sorted once by a frozen AI classification into these same categories, auditable rather than a live model. "No enrollment recorded (inferred)" is not a stated reason: it is read from a zero enrollment count, meaning the trial never enrolled anyone. "Not reported" means the sponsor left the field blank, shown rather than hidden.

Low accrual20 (32%)
Sponsor decision9 (15%)
No enrollment recorded (inferred)inferred7 (11%)
Safety or tolerability6 (10%)
Not reported4 (6%)
Other stated reason4 (6%)
External or regulatory4 (6%)
Efficacy or futility3 (5%)
Technical or device issue1 (2%)
Never initiated1 (2%)
Logistics or operations1 (2%)
Change in standard of care1 (2%)
Feasibility or operational failure1 (2%)
n = 62terminated or withdrawn
Evidence12 trials

A sample of terminated or withdrawn trials in this cell. Each links to its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

TrialSponsorStatusStated reason
NCT05552859SanofiterminatedLow accrual
NCT05228184IBSA Institut Biochimique SAterminatedLow accrual
NCT04997161AstraZenecaterminatedEfficacy or futility
NCT04864977Eli Lilly and CompanywithdrawnSponsor decision
NCT03779906Bracco Diagnostics, IncterminatedExternal or regulatory
NCT03646916Ascension HealthwithdrawnLow accrual
NCT03631771GE HealthcarewithdrawnChange in standard of care
NCT03344341AstraZenecaterminatedSponsor decision
NCT03338296Eisai Inc.terminatedExternal or regulatory
NCT03260868SanofiterminatedLow accrual
NCT03226899Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.terminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT03152084AstraZenecaterminatedLow accrual

Endocrine & Metabolic at other phases