Phase III

Endocrine & Metabolic

pain 40#49volume 2,081#9

Pain rank 49 of 76, volume rank 9 of 76 by industry trials. Trials here sit close to the map median on both amendments and enrollment failure.

What this is worth

The amendment proxy, priced. Order of magnitude, anchor cited, assumptions on the table.

Per 100 industry trials in this cell, about 41 rewrite their eligibility criteria at least once. At the industry average of $450k direct cost per amendment, with the 6+ weeks of delay each not even counted, that is at least $18M at stake per 100 trials. Across the roughly 2,081 industry trials here, the floor is $387M.

If amendments fell by10%$39M30%$116M50%$193M

Assumes $450k direct cost per amendment (industry average; Phase II median runs lower, Phase III higher, and delay cost is excluded), applied to the proxy rate. The proxy counts only trials with at least one eligibility change, so this understates the true exposure. How this is derived.

The signals

Industry sponsors first, since that is the commercial buyer, each figure shown against the map median. All-sponsor figures follow. A trial counts as concluded once it has finished, whether completed, terminated or withdrawn.

Industry sponsors40pain index
Eligibility amendments
41%vs map 40%proxyn = 46sampled
Enrollment failure
13%vs map 13%n = 1,756concluded
Startup lag
35 dvs map 45.5 dn = 1,090with dates
Median duration
19.0 mon = 1,993completed
All sponsors25pain index
Eligibility amendments
34%proxyn = 89sampled
Enrollment failure
13%n = 2,622concluded
Startup lag
44 dn = 1,605with dates
Median duration
20.2 mon = 3,100completed
Why these trials stoppedsponsor decision leads

The most common category here is sponsor decision (65 of 231 stopped). A keyword pass runs first; free text it could not place was sorted once by a frozen AI classification into these same categories, auditable rather than a live model. "No enrollment recorded (inferred)" is not a stated reason: it is read from a zero enrollment count, meaning the trial never enrolled anyone. "Not reported" means the sponsor left the field blank, shown rather than hidden.

Sponsor decision65 (28%)
Safety or tolerability33 (14%)
Not reported31 (13%)
Low accrual27 (12%)
Other stated reason22 (10%)
Efficacy or futility17 (7%)
External or regulatory10 (4%)
No enrollment recorded (inferred)inferred7 (3%)
Business or funding5 (2%)
Technical or device issue4 (2%)
Logistics or operations3 (1%)
Superseded by another study2 (1%)
Investigator decision or departure1 (0%)
Never initiated1 (0%)
Change in standard of care1 (0%)
Feasibility or operational failure1 (0%)
Completed or objective met1 (0%)
n = 231terminated or withdrawn
Evidence12 trials

A sample of terminated or withdrawn trials in this cell. Each links to its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

TrialSponsorStatusStated reason
NCT07357766Novo Nordisk A/SwithdrawnSponsor decision
NCT07057479Eurofarma Laboratorios S.A.withdrawnSponsor decision
NCT06894446Baxter Healthcare CorporationwithdrawnSponsor decision
NCT06560333Eurofarma Laboratorios S.A.withdrawnSponsor decision
NCT06307626argenxterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT06307613argenxterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT06276556Atom Therapeutics Co., LtdterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT06083675Novo Nordisk A/SwithdrawnSponsor decision
NCT05809687Dongkwang Pharm. Co., Ltd.withdrawnBusiness or funding
NCT05543928OPKO Health, Inc.terminatedSuperseded by another study
NCT05517447Immunovant Sciences GmbHterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT05444153Novo Nordisk A/SwithdrawnSponsor decision

Endocrine & Metabolic at other phases