Phase IV

General & cross-cutting

pain 54#33volume 396#56

Pain rank 33 of 76, volume rank 56 of 76 by industry trials. Trials here amend about 0.7x and fail enrollment about 1.2x the map median.

What this is worth

The amendment proxy, priced. Order of magnitude, anchor cited, assumptions on the table.

Per 100 industry trials in this cell, about 29 rewrite their eligibility criteria at least once. At the industry average of $450k direct cost per amendment, with the 6+ weeks of delay each not even counted, that is at least $13M at stake per 100 trials. Across the roughly 396 industry trials here, the floor is $51M.

If amendments fell by10%$5M30%$15M50%$25M

Assumes $450k direct cost per amendment (industry average; Phase II median runs lower, Phase III higher, and delay cost is excluded), applied to the proxy rate. The proxy counts only trials with at least one eligibility change, so this understates the true exposure. How this is derived.

The signals

Industry sponsors first, since that is the commercial buyer, each figure shown against the map median. All-sponsor figures follow. A trial counts as concluded once it has finished, whether completed, terminated or withdrawn.

Industry sponsors54pain index
Eligibility amendments
29%vs map 40%proxyn = 42sampled
Enrollment failure
16%vs map 13%n = 342concluded
Startup lag
61 dvs map 45.5 dn = 148with dates
Median duration
13.6 mon = 368completed
All sponsors20pain index
Eligibility amendments
24%proxyn = 85sampled
Enrollment failure
13%n = 2,014concluded
Startup lag
58 dn = 1,232with dates
Median duration
15.1 mon = 2,799completed
Why these trials stoppedlow accrual leads

The most common category here is low accrual (18 of 53 stopped). A keyword pass runs first; free text it could not place was sorted once by a frozen AI classification into these same categories, auditable rather than a live model. "No enrollment recorded (inferred)" is not a stated reason: it is read from a zero enrollment count, meaning the trial never enrolled anyone. "Not reported" means the sponsor left the field blank, shown rather than hidden.

Low accrual18 (34%)
Sponsor decision7 (13%)
Not reported5 (9%)
No enrollment recorded (inferred)inferred5 (9%)
Safety or tolerability4 (8%)
External or regulatory3 (6%)
Superseded by another study2 (4%)
Efficacy or futility2 (4%)
Other stated reason2 (4%)
Feasibility or operational failure1 (2%)
Investigator decision or departure1 (2%)
Change in standard of care1 (2%)
Business or funding1 (2%)
Logistics or operations1 (2%)
n = 53terminated or withdrawn
Evidence12 trials

A sample of terminated or withdrawn trials in this cell. Each links to its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

TrialSponsorStatusStated reason
NCT06204770Danone Specialized Nutrition IndonesiaterminatedInvestigator decision or departure
NCT05677126American Regent, Inc.withdrawnLow accrual
NCT05661682American Regent, Inc.withdrawnLow accrual
NCT05480761QOL Medical, LLCterminatedLow accrual
NCT05322525Oneness Biotech Co., Ltd.terminatedSponsor decision
NCT04235322Labo'LifeterminatedLow accrual
NCT03992716Fresenius KabiterminatedLow accrual
NCT03672643PfizerterminatedSafety or tolerability
NCT03661983Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.terminatedFeasibility or operational failure
NCT03563222Fresenius KabiterminatedExternal or regulatory
NCT03490396Midatech Pharma US Inc.terminatedLow accrual
NCT03481894Fresenius KabiwithdrawnExternal or regulatory

General & cross-cutting at other phases